Comments on: Liveblogging Day 11: Daily Summary

By: Anonygrl

Anonygrl — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:42:53 +0000

I'm sorry, but aside from posting some unnecessary porn

(Warning, folks, the links are porn)

do you have a point to make?

By: couragecampaign

couragecampaign — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:50:17 +0000

Thanks A

Been a while since I've missed on of those.

Thanks for leaving the comment.

-Julia

By: A

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:45:12 +0000

@Julia — you've got an unclosed bold tag which is causing almost the entire content plus all comments to be bold.

By: Jay

Jay — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:51:53 +0000

Interestingly, the graphic on that WSJ story pretty much confirms the arguments that laws have been passed to discriminate against gays and lesbians. And Happy, try not to bring racism into this issue.

By: Alexa Valavanis

Alexa Valavanis — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:57:17 +0000

A huge thank you for your work in keeping us informed. I am a proud supporter of the Courage Campaign.
Until there is equality for all,
Alexa

By: Happy

Happy — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:14:20 +0000

I was about to say the same thing. The whole tone of the article is Pro Prop 8. I noticed it was written by one of those Asians Against Same-Sex Marriage types (the infamous Dr. Tam indicated there are many such folks out there), Stu "Woo."

By: G. Rod

G. Rod — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:55:14 +0000

Cool GR

By: G. Rod

G. Rod — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:49:54 +0000

Well said GR

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:26:21 +0000

"All are allowed to marry. It does prohibit a gay man from marrying a gay man. It prohibits a lesbian woman from marrying a lesbian woman. It does not prohibit a gay man from marrying either a lesbian woman or a heterosexual woman."
"The restriction cannot be said to confer inferior status on gays because it equally prohibits a heterosexual man from marrying a gay man and a heterosexual woman from marrying a lesbian woman."

All are allowed to marry. It Does prohibit a black man from marrying a white woman. It prohibits a white man from marrying a black woman. It does not prohibit a white man from marrying a white woman and a black man from marrying a black woman.
The restriction cannot be said to confer inferior status on blacks because it equally prohibits a white man from marrying a black woman and a black man from marrying a white woman.

Just to show you how a couple little words make that sound just plain ludicrous. Jim Crow in a new bottle is still Jim Crow and it's no tastier than it was the first time around.

By: Roger

Roger — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:55:51 +0000

A question which seems to fit in here as well as anywhere :

Can Judge Walker declare sexual orientation a suspect classification, or is that a power reserved to the Supreme Court?

And if he can and does, can the Supreme Court overrule that?