<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging Day 8: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=liveblogging-day-8-part-i</link>
	<description>Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Tracking the right-wing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: s.a.g.</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201865</link>
		<dc:creator>s.a.g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201865</guid>
		<description>I wrote last week about what happened to fellow No on 8 protestors in front of the Mormon temple. The week after prop 8 passed a gay family in my hometown still had their NO on 8 signs up and their driveway was chalked with &quot;faggot.&quot; This was in the only county in Southern California that voted No.  
 
I&#039;ve only presented two or three instances, but I know there were many many more.  
What about the woman who was attacked in Richmond and raped because she had a rainbow sticker on her car? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote last week about what happened to fellow No on 8 protestors in front of the Mormon temple. The week after prop 8 passed a gay family in my hometown still had their NO on 8 signs up and their driveway was chalked with &quot;faggot.&quot; This was in the only county in Southern California that voted No.  </p>
<p>I&#039;ve only presented two or three instances, but I know there were many many more.<br />
What about the woman who was attacked in Richmond and raped because she had a rainbow sticker on her car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prop 8 Trial: Great Lawyer on Side of Good for Once [Lawsuits] - 25 Popular Blogs - Popular Bloggers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201864</link>
		<dc:creator>Prop 8 Trial: Great Lawyer on Side of Good for Once [Lawsuits] - 25 Popular Blogs - Popular Bloggers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201864</guid>
		<description>[...] Gore, also won today&#8217;s Supreme Court campaign finance decision. He is basically terrible! But here is the twist: he is arguing for gay marriage in the ongoing Proposition 8 [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gore, also won today&#8217;s Supreme Court campaign finance decision. He is basically terrible! But here is the twist: he is arguing for gay marriage in the ongoing Proposition 8 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201863</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201863</guid>
		<description>and i suck at explanation, apparently.  his analysis of data sets through the trial, and the importance of the economic effects, are particularly interesting in the light that he uses this approach. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i suck at explanation, apparently.  his analysis of data sets through the trial, and the importance of the economic effects, are particularly interesting in the light that he uses this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201862</guid>
		<description>&quot;[Judge Walker asked a lot of questions about data, including whether any questions were asked about which people think the bible was written by man vs. God and how their beliefs influence their views of same-sex marriage.]&quot; 
 
That&#039;s because Walker adhere&#039;s to a legal approach called &quot;Law and Economics&quot;.  Wikipedia describes this approach as: 
 
&quot; It includes the use of economic concepts to explain the effects of laws, to assess which legal rules are economically efficient, and to predict which legal rules will be promulgated&quot;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_and_economics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_and_economics&lt;/a&gt; 
 
It&#039;s a fascinating approach to legal theory. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;[Judge Walker asked a lot of questions about data, including whether any questions were asked about which people think the bible was written by man vs. God and how their beliefs influence their views of same-sex marriage.]&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s because Walker adhere&#039;s to a legal approach called &quot;Law and Economics&quot;.  Wikipedia describes this approach as: </p>
<p>&quot; It includes the use of economic concepts to explain the effects of laws, to assess which legal rules are economically efficient, and to predict which legal rules will be promulgated&quot;.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_and_economics" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_and_economics</a> </p>
<p>It&#039;s a fascinating approach to legal theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frijondi</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201855</link>
		<dc:creator>Frijondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201855</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t parents teach their kids to respect their elders anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t parents teach their kids to respect their elders anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201861</link>
		<dc:creator>IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201861</guid>
		<description>What gob-smacks me is that they point at the KKK attacking freedom riders in the South....and then claim that THEY are the freedom riders, and we are the KKK?!! 
 
I was spit at, cursed, and my car was vandalized.  I was flipped off so often by people in cars with the JesusFish emblem  that I decided that the middle finger must be a special sign for the Jesus Fish.   
 
Despite them saying this over, and over, and over, doesn&#039;t make it true....but their side&#039;s acquaintance with truth seems very limited.  What does it matter?  They win with lies, just like death panels and teabaggers. 
 
After the injunction against video...  after the SCOTUS deciding to hear the case from WA about petition signatures.... after NOM trying to overturn Maine&#039;s campaign transparency laws (more &lt;a href=&quot;http://gaymarriedcalifornian.blogspot.com/2010/01/scotus-and-equality-opponents-courage.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; .... and now after SCOTUS turning our political system over to corporations....I have no confidence in the SCOTUS, even if we win with Walker, and in the 9th circuit.  None at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gob-smacks me is that they point at the KKK attacking freedom riders in the South&#8230;.and then claim that THEY are the freedom riders, and we are the KKK?!! </p>
<p>I was spit at, cursed, and my car was vandalized.  I was flipped off so often by people in cars with the JesusFish emblem  that I decided that the middle finger must be a special sign for the Jesus Fish.   </p>
<p>Despite them saying this over, and over, and over, doesn&#039;t make it true&#8230;.but their side&#039;s acquaintance with truth seems very limited.  What does it matter?  They win with lies, just like death panels and teabaggers. </p>
<p>After the injunction against video&#8230;  after the SCOTUS deciding to hear the case from WA about petition signatures&#8230;. after NOM trying to overturn Maine&#039;s campaign transparency laws (more <a href="http://gaymarriedcalifornian.blogspot.com/2010/01/scotus-and-equality-opponents-courage.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> &#8230;. and now after SCOTUS turning our political system over to corporations&#8230;.I have no confidence in the SCOTUS, even if we win with Walker, and in the 9th circuit.  None at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201860</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201860</guid>
		<description>&quot;Holding off on marriage; sure, what guy wouldn&#8217;t want to leave his options open, yet have a guaranteed supply of sex? Why buy the cow?&quot; 
 
 
I can understand that.  Many a woman has bought an entire pig when what she really wanted was a big ol&#039; sausage. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Holding off on marriage; sure, what guy wouldn&rsquo;t want to leave his options open, yet have a guaranteed supply of sex? Why buy the cow?&quot; </p>
<p>I can understand that.  Many a woman has bought an entire pig when what she really wanted was a big ol&#039; sausage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201859</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201859</guid>
		<description>lots of talk about the central valley of ca! aka ground zero i wounder if they will  talk about having a whole town that is for yes on 8 the only town in the whole ca to go on record for the yes side! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of talk about the central valley of ca! aka ground zero i wounder if they will  talk about having a whole town that is for yes on 8 the only town in the whole ca to go on record for the yes side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201858</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, anti-equality people, you have shown that the dog you were kicking bit you a couple of times.  
 
If this were all playing out in one of your deceptive campaign commercials, I&#039;m sure you would be frothing at the mouth to have the dog put down as rabid. Unfortunately for you, you&#039;re in court against a legal team that greatly outclasses you and I have no doubt that while we don&#039;t condone dogs biting, you more than asked for it. 
 
You people are not the victims. We are not villifying you by pointing out that you are villains. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, anti-equality people, you have shown that the dog you were kicking bit you a couple of times.  </p>
<p>If this were all playing out in one of your deceptive campaign commercials, I&#039;m sure you would be frothing at the mouth to have the dog put down as rabid. Unfortunately for you, you&#039;re in court against a legal team that greatly outclasses you and I have no doubt that while we don&#039;t condone dogs biting, you more than asked for it. </p>
<p>You people are not the victims. We are not villifying you by pointing out that you are villains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann S.</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/21/liveblogging-day-8-part-i/#comment-201857</guid>
		<description>Fiona, thanks for the link.  I&#039;ll check it out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiona, thanks for the link.  I&#039;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

