<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Restraining Order denied: Logo staying up for now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now</link>
	<description>Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Tracking the right-wing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#171; Prop 8 Trial Tracker</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201447</link>
		<dc:creator>Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#171; Prop 8 Trial Tracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201447</guid>
		<description>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#124; TechBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#124; TechBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201446</guid>
		<description>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#171; Read NEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201445</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past &#171; Read NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201445</guid>
		<description>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entertainment &#187; Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201444</link>
		<dc:creator>Entertainment &#187; Rick Jacobs: Olson &#38; Boies Exorcise the Ghosts of Homophobia Past</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201444</guid>
		<description>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much less the panoply of expert witnesses who would demonstrate that the only reason the oxymoronic Protect Marriage and NOM band oppose marriage equality is that, well, it&#8217;s not their definition of marriage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prop 8 sponsor sues blog. Over a logo. &#124; TheWorldPolitics</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201443</link>
		<dc:creator>Prop 8 sponsor sues blog. Over a logo. &#124; TheWorldPolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201443</guid>
		<description>[...] While the suit is still ongoing, Protect Marriage did file for a temporary restraining order to force removal of the logo&#8211;which was appropriately denied. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While the suit is still ongoing, Protect Marriage did file for a temporary restraining order to force removal of the logo&#8211;which was appropriately denied. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge rules Against &#8216;Protect Marriage&#8217;, Allows &#8216;Courage Campaign&#8217; to Continue Using &#8216;Sassy&#8217; Prop 8 Trial Logo &#124; For all the happy people live the world gay city, Sydney &#124; sydneyhomos.com</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201442</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge rules Against &#8216;Protect Marriage&#8217;, Allows &#8216;Courage Campaign&#8217; to Continue Using &#8216;Sassy&#8217; Prop 8 Trial Logo &#124; For all the happy people live the world gay city, Sydney &#124; sydneyhomos.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201442</guid>
		<description>[...] Courage Campaign is facing a challenge from ProtectMarriage.com over its use of a similar logo in use on its Prop 8 Trial Tracker website. As you can see, the Courage Campaign&#039;s logo features two women with children rather than a [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Courage Campaign is facing a challenge from ProtectMarriage.com over its use of a similar logo in use on its Prop 8 Trial Tracker website. As you can see, the Courage Campaign&#39;s logo features two women with children rather than a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merry</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201441</link>
		<dc:creator>Merry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201441</guid>
		<description>George, a VAST number of children in this country are not being raised by the parents who created them ... and whether this should or should not be the case is an entirely separate argument which has absolutely *nothing* to do with whether or not gay marriages are acknowledged by the government.  Marriage doesn&#039;t force anyone to take responsibility for their children.  (Oh, how I wish that it did!)   
 
Not everyone who gets married plans to have children, and it is just as easy to procreate outside of marriage as it is inside of it.  Limiting marriage only to those who are biologically capable of creating children together would only be logical if one were to also a) illegalize extramarital sex, b) make procreation a requirement for every married couple, and c) illegalize marriage for anyone who, for any reason, is infertile, and dissolve marriages between any couple who does not create a child together.  Unless you&#039;re prepared to argue just as hard for all of those conditions as well, then you&#039;ve got to drop the marriage-is-for-the-children assertion, because it&#039;s just simply not true. 
 
And that&#039;s not resentment speaking at all... it&#039;s just logic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, a VAST number of children in this country are not being raised by the parents who created them &#8230; and whether this should or should not be the case is an entirely separate argument which has absolutely *nothing* to do with whether or not gay marriages are acknowledged by the government.  Marriage doesn&#039;t force anyone to take responsibility for their children.  (Oh, how I wish that it did!)   </p>
<p>Not everyone who gets married plans to have children, and it is just as easy to procreate outside of marriage as it is inside of it.  Limiting marriage only to those who are biologically capable of creating children together would only be logical if one were to also a) illegalize extramarital sex, b) make procreation a requirement for every married couple, and c) illegalize marriage for anyone who, for any reason, is infertile, and dissolve marriages between any couple who does not create a child together.  Unless you&#039;re prepared to argue just as hard for all of those conditions as well, then you&#039;ve got to drop the marriage-is-for-the-children assertion, because it&#039;s just simply not true. </p>
<p>And that&#039;s not resentment speaking at all&#8230; it&#039;s just logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201440</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201440</guid>
		<description>I love this logo.  Can I buy a sign for my front yard?  Nevermind, my Christian neighbors will steal it like the last two.  I hope the world can see the prop 8 people for whom they really are. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this logo.  Can I buy a sign for my front yard?  Nevermind, my Christian neighbors will steal it like the last two.  I hope the world can see the prop 8 people for whom they really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201439</guid>
		<description>To add to the list of similar logos, see Big Brothers Big Sisters of America </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to the list of similar logos, see Big Brothers Big Sisters of America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/20/restraining-order-denied-logo-staying-up-for-now/#comment-201438</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=1000#comment-201438</guid>
		<description>after reading george&#039;s numerous complaints about homosexuals snatching away babies from their rightful parents, it almost sounds as if he has an ex-wife who left him for a woman and took the kids with her. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after reading george&#039;s numerous complaints about homosexuals snatching away babies from their rightful parents, it almost sounds as if he has an ex-wife who left him for a woman and took the kids with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

