Comments on: Liveblogging Day 2: Daily Summary

By: Liveblogging from Prop 8 Trial: Day 2 Recap « AaronEndré.com

Liveblogging from Prop 8 Trial: Day 2 Recap « AaronEndré.com — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:28:19 +0000

[...] Liveblogging Day 2: Daily Summary [...]

By: Dan Lilley

Dan Lilley — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:15:06 +0000

I am very CONFUSED by the content of this blog. I was hoping for a TRANSCRIPT of the proceedings, not an editorialized interpretation.

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPT so we can read for ourselves what is being said in the examinations?

Commentary is fine, but not here. WHERE IS THE TRANSCRIPT?

By: K!r!lleXXI

K!r!lleXXI — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:05:35 +0000

I'm afraid this summary was compiled with significant errors!
Some parts are being repeated, and some other parts are missing!
I had to go back to reading from the original Rick's posts.
Please, make an effort and recompile this summary in a proper way, so we could link people for one-page-per-day reading!

By: Ron Bernard-Rivera

Ron Bernard-Rivera — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:54:47 +0000

Thank you so much for doing all this work. I really feel like I'm in the courtroom when I read this material.

By: Prup (aka Jim Benton

Prup (aka Jim Benton — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:43:44 +0000

Actually, Olson and two of the plaintiffs were on THE TODAY SHOW this morning. Didn't see it or know if it is available on line.

By: Prop 8: Day II « Leave it to Seaver

Prop 8: Day II « Leave it to Seaver — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:24:12 +0000

[...] from Karen Ocamb. Day 1 and Day 2 (part 1 and part 2). The Courage Campaign’s recap is here. The focus of today’s hearing was on the history of marriage with Harvard Professor Nancy [...]

By: Allen

Allen — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:29:55 +0000

Thank you Rick for the information so far and to Paul for stepping in and keeping the information flowing. I know that listening to the prop 8 group was hard. Just reading what you are reporting was hard for me. Please keep it coming. Thanks

By: Kim

Kim — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:39:03 +0000

If marriage is primarily about procreation, then hetero infertile couples will be disappointed to learn that their marriages could be invalidated under this new definition.

Thanks for keeping the public updated. Besides NPR, there is no word that this trial is even underway.

I am a public school teacher in CA with a professional clear credential and an MS in curriculum and instruction and no where in the California Content Standards is marriage discussed.

By: buzzbeard

buzzbeard — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:19:22 +0000

thankyou for doing this!

*love*

By: Beth

Beth — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:37:24 +0000

Thanks Rick for an awesome job.